1. Chat

Cleaner Sacked for Taking Leftover Sandwich

In the News

I was reading about a cleaner who got sacked because she took a leftover tuna sandwich from a meeting room.

Honestly what has the world come to.. why do people make such a big issue out of silly things. The cleaner said it was common for staff to take leftover food for their lunch but someone wasn't happy and must have dropped in a complaint to the contractor. Not even a "don't do it again" but a straight firing 🤦‍♀️

www.theguardian.com/law/2024/feb/20/common-practice-to-take-leftovers-says-cleaner-sacked-over-tuna-sandwich

Nadiaparveen
2 months ago
What do you think of this?+20 points
Advertisement
Lynibis

Why would ANYONE begrudge someone a left over sandwich? I really cannot understand the depths to which some people will stoop to hurt a fellow human being.

Like
Reply7
JLouM

Sounds extremely petty. Thought they would be glad not wasting food and cleaning up at the same time. Some jobsworth. If it was common then sack all of them and don’t have cleaners!

Like
Reply3
telmel

JLouM I think it is terrible but sometimes there is a reason behind these rules, it might not be down to theft but health and safety

For instance , if a cleaner or anyone in the building picked up the sandwich and ate it, and was violently ill or even died , the sandwich may contain nuts for example, then the person who left the sandwich or the company could be held responsible for the injury or death if it went to court

This is why some supermarkets or food establishments dont give away food and bin it , they are afraid of the consequences

Like
Reply2
JLouM

telmel Yes I agree with what you say but then also if someone knows they have allergies/intolerances they wouldn’t take it anyway.

Like
Reply2
jam45

JLouM Years ago, when I worked as a catering assistant for a pub restaurant all the staff would wait until the left-over food was returned to the kitchen and ate the lot. If I was the cleaner, I would go to the Citizen Advice and get advice on how to get compensation. It is not theft because the food would have been thrown away instead.

Like
Reply2
telmel

JLouM But how would they know J, if the sandwich had been say a two pack, maybe the content info might not be on the remaining sandwich and the person might be oblivious of the ingredients

It doesn't actually say in the article , just the cost of it

Probably it was just a tuna sandwich , but the company would not know peoples allergies and i am sure if someone did suffer an incident over eating it the relatives of the recipient would take action if anything fatal had happened , so they would have rules over this type of thing

I still think it is bad what they have done to her , she could have been just given a warning, but not knowing their company policies it's hard to judge their actions

Like
Reply
JLouM

telmel They wouldn’t know what was in the sandwich by looking at it. People with allergies/intolerances are responsible for their own health so just wouldn’t risk it anyway. People that haven’t are more likely to take it so wouldn’t be an issue anyway.

Like
Reply
MelissaLee1

Goes around comes around tis often said.Horrendous behaviour.

Like
Reply1
jms19

I agree with what you’re saying 100% but i know that companies want to know they can trust their employees. The line of thinking is if they will take the opportunity to do that they would do worse given the chance.

I don’t agree with it but always would think is it worth losing my job over something small

Like
Reply2
Leannexxx

They could have given her a warning first as it was a left over sandwich

Like
Reply1
telmel

Leannexxx I just noticed your comment L, i posted the same after you , yes i also think she should have been given a warning first

Like
Reply
Ilovethebeach

If the sandwich was going to be chucked away I don't see a problem with her eating it. On the other hand who knows how long it had not been refrigerated for and tuna could have been on the turn and made her ill. I think there are rules about how long food can be out the fridge for at buffets for example.

Like
Reply2
Consumer

Sad state of affairs when someone can't even prevent food waste without getting fired ☹️

Like
Reply1
tonyhrst

I'ts time to trim the herd !!

Like
Reply
Auntielettie

Why has so much been written that she was the cleaner, that was irrelevant as far as I can see, she was an employee and the same rule should have been applied whatever her job.

Like
Reply1
One of the UK's largest deal hunting communities

Join for free to get genuine deals, money saving advice and help from our friendly community

Tom Church
Co-Founder &
Chief Bargain Hunter
Tom Church, Co-Founder
We value your privacy

We use cookies to help give you the best experience on our website with improved customisation, analytics & advertising (inc. personalisation). You can read our full cookie policy. Please either , or .