1. Chat

Who is to blame for the Post Office scandal? Will they get prosecuted ?

In the News

According to the Department for Business and Trade there have been 983 UK-wide convictions, with 700 being Post Office prosecutions and 283 by the Crown Prosecution Service, since the Horizon System was installed in 1999.

Between 1999 and 2015, the Post Office prosecuted 700 sub-postmasters and sub-postmistresses - an average of one a week - based on information from a faulty computer system called Horizon.

Shelton
4 months ago
What do you think of this?+20 points
Advertisement
martinlufc5637

I doubt it, it's just typical that these people have been fighting to clear their names for years and it has taken a TV programme to get things moving super fast, we all know that royal mail and the government tried to cover this up big time

Like
Reply
telmel

I have just read this in the news online, another unbelievable jigsaw piece to this scandal

Post office investigators were paid CASH BONUSES for every postmaster convicted during the horizon scandal

No wonder the convictions went ahead despite all the evidence stacked against the Horizon system

Absolutely disgusting, heads need to roll 😠

By the way that CBE that Paula Vennells handed back in shame should be given to Alan Bates for all he did for the victims

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/post-office-paid-out-cash-31855063

Like
Reply2
jms19

I just don’t understand how they didn’t realise something was up when so many longstanding sub post masters all of a sudden decided to “steal” from them.

From reading a few things it seems like they just swept it under the rug because they knew it would be too big an issue to sort

Like
Reply1
BonzoBanana

Fujitsu need to be fully prosecuted for this, let their insurance take the hit for compensation rather than British tax payers. There should be a huge number of other people prosecuted too, kicked out of their jobs and their pensions taken from them and possibly custodial sentences for some. Just another indication of the true incompetence of politicians in this country and seems to effect all parties, Liberal Democrat, Conservative and Labour. All utterly useless individuals who can't do their job competently and yet pay themselves huge sums.

Like
Reply2
Consumer

BonzoBanana I agree. Compensation needs to be paid by the organisation who produced the faulty system. Seems like anyone with connections can call themselves a politician, show off their level of incompetence in doing their job and still be paid large amounts of money.

Like
Reply1
Consumer

Clearly, the system wasn't investigated because it benefitted enough people in power not to do this. Not even a system investigation by the police OR Crown Prosecution Service that could have cleared these people. No suspicion at all as numbers grew (speaks to the level of how they can not be trusted to effectively do their jobs!). Unsurprisingly, someone benefitted financially from all these unjust prosecutions. I hope the investigators will have to pay back their conviction bonus money to the victims. Humans do a lot of nasty things to each other - this is just one example of how things can roll in this country if you're not in a position of power 🙄

Like
Reply2
telmel

Offering the victims £600,000 max is an absolute insult , some are only going to get £75,000

Don't get me wrong, i believe in supporting the Ukraine, for example, safety and democracy are at stake but the government have already sent £9.3 billion of tax payers money there at the drop of a hat , and i read they are pledging another £1.6 billion

So why are they offering this pittance to people so wronged, some committed suicide , most lost their homes and livelihoods , aren't they worthy also ??

Besides Fujitsu should be made to fork out for the victims , they caused the tragedy , but i wouldn't hold my breath, look what China caused in the world with covid, and nobody has challenged them in regards to compensation !!

Like
Reply
Leannexxx

telmel and that's what happens with this country give but don't help there own we have helped given somewhere to live paid for them and yet we still have thousands of people of are own living on the streets and some are not happy either with there living accommodation well sorry to say go home if you don't like it some people just expect everything handled to them

Like
Reply3
telmel

Leannexxx Well said L

Like
Reply2
One of the UK's largest deal hunting communities

Join for free to get genuine deals, money saving advice and help from our friendly community

Tom Church
Co-Founder &
Chief Bargain Hunter
Tom Church, Co-Founder
Want deals & discounts automatically?
+100 bonus points!
Latest Deals Browser Extension
Latest Deals Mobile App
  • Download our app
  • 1,000+ new deals every day
  • Earn free Amazon vouchers
  • Daily deal alerts - never miss the best offers!
  • Download the Latest Deals iOS AppDownload the Latest Deals Android App
Latest Deals
Disclaimer

The content on Latest Deals is a combination of information submitted by members of the public and the Latest Deals team. Whilst we make every effort to try and ensure genuine, accurate content we cannot guarantee it. Please always carry out your own due diligence and double check the details of an offer on the retailer's own website.

How this site works
  • To cover the site's running costs, Latest Deals uses affiliate links.
  • If you click on a link to an external website and make a purchase, Latest Deals may earn a commission.
  • We allow deals to be shared on Latest Deals irrelevant of whether or not they generate us money. Our #1 concern is helping you save money.
  • If you have any questions about how the site works, drop us a message. We're always happy to help.
Copyright © 2024 Latest Deals Limited
Registered in England and Wales. Company number 10286141. WeWork 6th Floor, International House, 1 St Katherine's Way, E1W 1UN
We value your privacy

We use cookies to help give you the best experience on our website with improved customisation, analytics & advertising (inc. personalisation). You can read our full cookie policy. Please either , or .